Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:08:45 02/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 12, 2003 at 10:45:32, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On February 12, 2003 at 09:30:17, Uri Blass wrote: > >>1)The machine is broken > >the problem is URI, that i have 5 machines and e.g. playing style >BETA6 on ANOTHER machine has 5:1. Playing style BETA4 on another machine >has 11:6. > >BETA5 so far (looked on the screen in this moment) has 14.5-0.5 14/1/0 (15) >96.7%. very good result. > > > >>2)There is a big improvement and my guess is to expect more than 65% in more >>games(Note that I do not expect more than 90% because I believe that part of it >>has to be some luck). >> >>Thorsten found that 1 is false so I guess that 2 is correct. > >if ONE machine would be broken, the result of BETA4 and BETA6 would not that >"close" to the good results of BETA5. > >Another tester (so not only different machine but also different person :-)) >told me about having > >Rebel.eng versus Beta7 3,5 zu 10,5 20 min >blitz this morning. More than 65% but not more than 90% based on these games. This is my guess. I will be surprised if it continue to score more than 90% in a long match but I will be also surprised if it scores less than 65%. I agree that based on the data it does not make sense to assume that it is inside the reasonable statistical error but I also find it hard to believe that the difference is the same as your results suggest. I guess that part of the data has to be some luck. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.