Author: Tom Kerrigan
Date: 13:13:29 02/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 12, 2003 at 11:47:21, Robert Hyatt wrote: >But I don't >think OOOE is _nearly_ as important for decent architectures as it is for >architectures >that have significant design problems like X86. Fine, it's a 30% benefit to Alpha and MIPS, maybe it's 40% for x86... >>>The Cray T932 was the last 64 bit machine they built that I used. And it >>How many NPS does Crafty get on it? >about 7M. >And that was Cray Blitz, not Crafty. I have not tried to run Crafty on a Cray, 7M per processor? How many processors did those Crays come with? 32? So Crazy Blitz was searching 224M NPS? I stand corrected, the T932 is several times faster than any other processor ever made. >>>I did a branchless FirstOne() in asm a few weeks back here, just to test. >>>It used a cmov, and it wasn't slower than the one with a branch. If the >>On a Pentium III? >On a pentium IV. >Although I did test it on my PIII xeon box, so I guess the answer is "yes" to >the III as >well... You "guess"? I never said anything about cmovs being bad for the P4, so why do you keep talking about the P4? -Tom
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.