Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 09:24:58 09/30/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 30, 1998 at 01:21:35, Shaun Graham wrote: \ > I'm afraid that you simply don't understand the nature of the statute, and of >course that is no fault of yours, and I did not go into all of the details of >the statute. The case law of harrassment most often but not always involves >even distance, I.e X will not come within 25ft of y. When it comes to >electronic comunicae, Hyatt by directly speaking of what i wrote, when he has no >"LEGITIMATE REASON"(a judge decides what's legitimate) for doing so, especially >when his post claimed that i stated the opposite of what i said, he is still >going to be in violation of the statute. Further since he in writing stated >that he wouldn't read or reply to my postings , he should have never saw what i >wrote in the first place. Further any legal mediator will take HEAVY note of a >person who in writing says that they will not engage in such and such >behavior(replying and reading my posts in this case), who then goes ahead and >blatantly conflicts themselves with their written statement. There are many >many other reasons why his behavior fulffills the stautute as well, but I do not >wish to copy the statute here as it is lengthy, and you probably wouldn't want >to read it. However any law library, has a copy of state and usually federal >statutes, if you wish to look it up. No. You missed a post I wrote. If you want to make a private agreement with Bob that you guys aren't going to respond to each other's posts, you make a private agreement and enforce it in private. If you want to get a restraining order against Bob, then get a restraining order against Bob and have the judge enforce it. The moderators are here to enforce the charter of CCC, which in large part means that we are supposed to defend the group from abusive posters. This means that we are most concerned about abusive posts. That is what we are looking for, and if a post is not abusive it will almost certainly go right by us and we will do nothing about it. I haven't spent even a few minutes trying to go back and verify this agreement you mention. That is not by responsibility, it is not my job, it is contrary to my job, it would be a waste of my time. What I have seen are a few instances of threats and abuse from you, and you've been informed about these. It is crucial that you understand this and not do this again.. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.