Author: Pavel Blokhine
Date: 17:17:12 02/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 13, 2003 at 17:28:42, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On February 13, 2003 at 17:21:20, Otello Gnaramori wrote: > >>And from the same source : >>"In 1997, when IBM terminated the Deep Blue project, the computer-chess field >>was left to talented enthusiasts. In the past five and a half years, new >>programming techniques have combined with superior chess knowledge to create a >>quality of machine chess that is far superior to that of Deep Blue." >> >> >>w.b.r. >>Otello > > >Unfortunately, because Deep Blue's records were never made public it is quite >useless to discuss the strength of Deep Blue vis-à-vis the strength of Deep >Junior. IBM said Deep Blue crushed other programs, but what value are these >statements without records? > >Yes, Deep Blue was 100 times faster, but so what? Sheer power means little in >chess because it is a mathematically near-infinite game. The only way to measure >the strength of a chess-playing computer is to analyze its moves. While putting >Deep Blue's six games to the test with current top programs -- Deep Junior and >Deep Fritz -- we discovered that they consistently play better than Deep Blue > >Yes, this is the only GM that can make this claim, NOT Kramnik, since Kramnik >din't play against Deeper Blue. > >Pichard. Pichard, Once again it's Deep Blue, not Deeper Blue as you're so persistant to write. Even Kasparov who, like you said has a doctorate in chess, referred to it as Deep Blue. So where do you get the Deeper from?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.