Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: OOP - Not for computer chess?

Author: Matthew Hull

Date: 21:07:50 02/13/03

Go up one level in this thread

On February 13, 2003 at 23:21:57, Dann Corbit wrote:

>Deep Junior is OOP

If so then it is interesting.  I don't program OOP myself, so I was pretty much
quoting the promise of OOP from a buisness perspective in which utility and
economy of human resources were the selling points rather than performance.

Matt

• Re: OOP - Not for computer chess? Matt Taylor 22:03:03 02/13/03
  • Re: OOP - Not for computer chess? Dann Corbit 22:46:12 02/13/03
    • Re: OOP - Not for computer chess? Matt Taylor 00:03:46 02/14/03
      • Re: OOP - Not for computer chess? David Rasmussen 02:57:57 02/14/03
        • Re: OOP - Not for computer chess? Dave Gomboc 05:30:55 02/14/03
          • Re: OOP - Not for computer chess? David Rasmussen 12:22:44 02/14/03
            • Re: OOP - Not for computer chess? Dan Andersson 04:05:57 02/15/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.