Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: OOP - Not for computer chess?

Author: Antonio Dieguez

Date: 22:00:05 02/13/03

Go up one level in this thread

On February 14, 2003 at 00:06:11, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On February 13, 2003 at 23:46:54, Jeremiah Penery wrote:
>
>>On February 13, 2003 at 23:21:57, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>
>>>Deep Junior is OOP
>>
>>How do you know?
>
>Amir has posted that he uses C++ many times.

tss, I do also use C++ but I wouldn't say I use OOP :)
the only pretty thing I have is the engine class (used by the amyan main class),
wich uses the position class, the thinker class, the booker class, and so on.

But having a class for a piece type looks too much academic for me :)

• Re: OOP - Not for computer chess? Antonio Dieguez 22:47:36 02/13/03
  • Re: OOP - Not for computer chess? Matt Taylor 00:06:20 02/14/03
    • Re: OOP - Not for computer chess? Dave Gomboc 05:31:22 02/14/03
      • Re: OOP - Not for computer chess? Matt Taylor 10:40:37 02/14/03
        • Re: OOP - Not for computer chess? Gareth McCaughan 17:36:54 02/14/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.