Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 14:02:20 02/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 14, 2003 at 16:31:42, Thorsten Czub wrote: >BETA1: 8.5:10.5 6/5/8 (0) 44% >BETA2: 9.5:11.5 5/9/7 (3) 45.2% >BETA3: 25.5:18.5 18/15/11 (7) 58% >BETA4: 24:17 14/20/7 (8) 58.5% >BETA5: 12.5:11.5 8/9/7 (12) 52.1% >BETA6: 19:17 11/16/9 (3) 52.8% >BETA6c: 7.5:6.5 5/5/4 53% >BETA7: 12:8 9/6/5 (2) 60% >BETA7c:11.5:6.5 8/7/3 (1) 63.9% > >Here the results of different Rebel12 beta-versions against the default style >rebel.eng. > Hi! Please take this serious and play at least 200 games with each version to minimize the randomness factor. No need to hurry and make wrong decisions. As a notorious Rebel-fan I really hope and want that you can find the best possible settings for Rebel. I can only say that after several thousand games I can conclude that Rebel XP for some or another reason isn´t better then Rebel Century4. One of the reasons is its unwillingness to develop undeveloped pieces and castle until it is to late, so I guess this factors should be changed in some way. I´m sorry that I for the moment haven´t much time to take part in this interesting experiment. Maybee later when the final decisions between the best engines are on the agenda, I can take part in some way. Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.