Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 14:54:15 02/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 14, 2003 at 17:30:04, Ed Schröder wrote: >On February 14, 2003 at 17:08:31, Bertil Eklund wrote: > >>On February 14, 2003 at 13:51:19, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>On February 14, 2003 at 09:12:29, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>> >>>>>The SSDF doesn't claim it is a statistical absolute either, >>>> >>>>This is false. The SSDF speaks of a Number One. Of a new number one etc. Doyou >>>>want the evidence? Also ChessBase printed the same wording in its commercials! >>>>Still not believing me? It is as if you didn't want or can't understand what I >>>>am saying. I don't say they are cheaters. I did never say these Swedes are not >>>>worth called testers. I say that they make unneccessary mistakes. And I say that >>>>the staff there is simply not listening. >>> >>> >>>Rolf, >>> >>>Read the list as the Blix report, for everybody there is something in it. >>> >>>Ed >>> >>>PS, both are Swedish. > >>Please develop your meaning of the the statement a bit!! "Die dumme Schweden" >>comes to mind! >>Do you mean that Bush and Rolf are (w)right! > > >Bertil, > >You can be proud on both Blix and the SSDF. Today Blix did a great job, the SSDF >is doing that for 20 years. > >But if you are against the SSDF nothing will convince you and you will always >find something, that's the meaning for what I stated. > >My best, > Thank you! I didn´t thought so! It feels a bit simple to talk about computerchess, for the moment when half of the world worries about the world-wide complications of the Irak-conflict. Anyway good luck with the Rebel project! I´m sure it is still a lot of potential in your engine. As i have mentioned it is still some "simple" weaknesses that could be fixed. I hope I can contribute later on with some tests or suggestions. Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.