Author: Uri Blass
Date: 16:05:46 02/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 14, 2003 at 16:31:42, Thorsten Czub wrote: >BETA1: 8.5:10.5 6/5/8 (0) 44% >BETA2: 9.5:11.5 5/9/7 (3) 45.2% >BETA3: 25.5:18.5 18/15/11 (7) 58% >BETA4: 24:17 14/20/7 (8) 58.5% >BETA5: 12.5:11.5 8/9/7 (12) 52.1% >BETA6: 19:17 11/16/9 (3) 52.8% >BETA6c: 7.5:6.5 5/5/4 53% >BETA7: 12:8 9/6/5 (2) 60% >BETA7c:11.5:6.5 8/7/3 (1) 63.9% > >Here the results of different Rebel12 beta-versions against the default style >rebel.eng. > >the best engines so far seem to be >beta3 and beta4 with ~ 58% >and beta7 and beta7c with >60%. > >for more information: > >http://www.thorstenczub.de/rebel12.html What happened with the 14.5-.5 of Beta5 that you reported? see http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?283849 I guess based on the 12.5-11.5 that there was an error with that result. What was the problem? Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.