Author: Michael Cummings
Date: 18:07:57 02/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 14, 2003 at 20:48:48, John C Collins wrote: >How many agree? It's pretty clear that he has his own agenda to promote when he >comes here which i think is to argue and debate, but most notably to stir up >trouble. Oh please, grow up I am sure you are talking about his SSDF comments, of course he is right. I stated this years back when Chessmaster 6000 was beating the top engines of the time, and was not on the list because games would have to be manually played. The list is somewhat worthless, gives a fraction of relevant information due to the simple fact that not all programs are represented. Chess Genius 7 for instance is available via download off the net, a commercial program with great history. I looked at the settings and has a option for Auto playing of games. Yet it is not bothered to be included on this list, other than some really old version. Maybe if the people doing the testing took the time to at least get things more in-depth and right, then more credit would be given. The top 10 programs are strong in the list, maybe it is an accurate account, but I doubt it. So before you jump up and down like a monkey, stop insulting people. Rolf may try to be a pain sometimes, but don't attack him on something that he has the right to his opinion on.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.