Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Statistical methods and their consequences

Author: Jonas Cohonas

Date: 00:18:31 02/15/03

Go up one level in this thread


Very off topic in the meantime, so I will give my last message. You are funny. I
>like your messages but you have a general habit to teach me.

Just suggestions Rolf, not orders.
I am not trying to teach you anything, teaching you would imply that i am right
in what i say, but i am not sure that i am, i have pointed this out before.

That is normally
>the job of a lay psychologist. [Real psychologists dont do that.]

See previous comment.

>All what you say is important for all kind of spin doctors.

There you go again with the spindoctor, do you honestly think that is what i am
doing?

But I am not such a
>species. I am a totally free "scientist" in such talks. Also, I don't want to
>persuade people. You have no understanding for me. None. This is a pity. Do you
>believe that a guy like Walser looks what people think or expect? Did you never
>reflect such positions? I write the best that I can! And the rest is to others.
>Most debates go about misunderstandings. Or when I had asked questions - since I
>am a lay in CC! But when I talk about statistics or other topics, I have enough
>knowledge.
>
>From 1996 on, from my first contact in rgcc, I always met people who start to
>tell me how I should behave, don't you find that crazy? Is that a CC deficiency?

Maybe there is something in your behaviour that you might need to look at, given
that general response you just discribed.

>I am psychologist but I would ever do that.

I thought you were a scientist :)

>Next point. Wider, more. Would you say that I get no reactions? :)

No, but you would probably have more people wanting to "get" you point/s.

>And then! People I have enough who talk with me, but I would seek for real
>experts. And they are perhaps not here. I mean real scientists. Bob is the only
>one I know.

>Could we now end this very personal debate? It has a disadvantage because I
>don't know you.

Well i don't know you either, but i am fine with this debate, however if it
makes you uncomfortable to discus on a personal level, then by all means let's
drop it.

BTW just stating the obvious, it is through personal relations you get to know
someone.

Regards
Jonas



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.