Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 00:29:26 02/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 14, 2003 at 08:38:22, Albert Silver wrote: >On February 14, 2003 at 08:25:58, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>I think that programs in the order for being tested am, how they are sold >>commercially after date! >> >>S7 was sold about one month later, than Fritz 8!!! >> >>Thus normally now first Fritz 8 should be tested. >> >>I go of it out of that ChessBase Fritz 8 yet did not submit. >> >>Why not? >> >>ChessBase know why. >> >>;-) >> >>Eduard > >Are you suggesting they withheld Fritz 8 because they knew it would perfomr >better and might hurt Shredder 7 sales, or that Fritz 8 might actually not do so >good (unlikely) in which case it might hurt sales of Fritz 8? > > Albert SSDF has to be criticized. They claim to be independent, but in fact they are not more than a sales argument for Chessbase. They shouldnt have tested Shredder 7 before they test Fritz 8.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.