Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:22:05 02/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 15, 2003 at 03:29:26, Drexel,Michael wrote: >On February 14, 2003 at 08:38:22, Albert Silver wrote: > >>On February 14, 2003 at 08:25:58, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >> >>>I think that programs in the order for being tested am, how they are sold >>>commercially after date! >>> >>>S7 was sold about one month later, than Fritz 8!!! >>> >>>Thus normally now first Fritz 8 should be tested. >>> >>>I go of it out of that ChessBase Fritz 8 yet did not submit. >>> >>>Why not? >>> >>>ChessBase know why. >>> >>>;-) >>> >>>Eduard >> >>Are you suggesting they withheld Fritz 8 because they knew it would perfomr >>better and might hurt Shredder 7 sales, or that Fritz 8 might actually not do so >>good (unlikely) in which case it might hurt sales of Fritz 8? >> >> Albert > >SSDF has to be criticized. They claim to be independent, but in fact they are >not more than a sales argument for Chessbase. They shouldnt have tested Shredder >7 before they test Fritz 8. I think that they test what the programmers want them to test. It has nothing to do with chessbase. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.