Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 03:53:22 02/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 15, 2003 at 04:50:41, pavel wrote: >On February 14, 2003 at 21:21:29, Dann Corbit wrote: > > >>Everybody is entitled to an opinion, even an incredibly unpopular opinion. It >>is true that CCC was formed largely in an effort to escape from Rolf on >>news:rec.games.chess.computer. But his antics here have actually been pretty >>tame, compared to what others have done. >> > >Sorry Dann, I disagree. >If CCC was mainly formed in an effort to escape from Rolf in RGCC. Than I see >absolutely no reason to allow him to trool in this forum. Or we will end up >creating another forum just to excape from Rolf in CCC. > >It's not about his opinions, trolls also have opinions; opinions that looks more >like trools. And it doesn't need a genius to figure out which one is a trool and >which one is an opinion. > >In case of Rolf, history speaks for him. > >Cheers, >pavs I have a little correction. Here we see a typical case of character assassination. And it goes like this: (1) Some anonymous poster talks about Rolf trolling (2) A moderator (CCC) supports opinions for everybody. Then he uses the telling vocabulary "even incredibly [!] unpopular" opinions. For Rolf he states that his "antics" [!] were pretty tame... Comment: We have here the creation of a fantasy world. All is unreal. The expression of unpopular opinions is telling from someone who is never tired to confirm that he has a degree in numerical analysis. From unpopular opinions to antics. Still they are very tame. You see? There is nothing real or objectively existing but we have prejudices or an agenda. And we have a kind of little pressure group that is extremely active in their complains to the modsB that this we-clique could well be a union of 3 guys with some dozen pseudos. And these 3 or 4 people talk about "we" and moderator Dann is talking about "incredibly unpopular openinons" of Rolf. Who's supporting whom? We have here a dramatic turn-over of all values. I will show you: --- people like "Terry" insult and use vulgary speech but _nothing_ happens --- people like Rolf write very independant opinions and a mod admits that such opinions are incredibly unpopular while his "antics" are "pretty tame" Wow, Mister Dann Corbitt speaks of antics in case of Rolf but Terry meanwhile spreads his fecal bonmots. Isn't that funny? And by consequence another event does happen: (3) We have a moderator (CTF) who adopts the nonsense of (1) ad begins to make a court case against Rolf! Like the exorcists he has no real and objective facts but he still has a dogmatic case. IF CCC was created to get away from Rolf, we must now create a forum to get away from Rolf in CCC! That is the logic of a moderator who - in CTF - does nothing against the fecal insults of a Terry McCracken! Isn't that funny? But has Rolf committed crimes against the charta? Yes, this moderator says: he has opinions who are 'trools'! But how could we discover them?? Oh, well, that is easy, folks. Rolf has a history [sic!]. He is right. The history is here: http://hometown.aol.de/rolftueschen/rolftueschenmosaik.html There you can see the history in rgcc from 1996-2002. We also had already a priest who collected the two or three bad expressions by Rolf - - - in over 9000 messages. Is moderator pavs talking about that? Interesting! Terry is using fecal vocabulary in 99% of all his messages. That would mean compared to Rolf that Rolf must have at least 8900 messages with such terminology. So far about numbers, hard facts and exorcism. Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.