Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 08:28:08 02/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 15, 2003 at 10:30:00, Amir Ban wrote: >super-GM. I've seen opinions expressed that the programs are 2500 in >understanding and 2900 in tactics, so you get an overall 2700 performance. I'm >not buying it. The same for some comments like "typical computer move" which in >some cases were so unthinking that they were seemingly generated by a computer. > > I believe that the two different ways of playing chess: human chess and >computer chess are starting to converge at their highest level. To be sure, the >programs are from time to time conceding their silicon origins, but in the same >way we humans must admit that when events exceed our understanding, then >something mechanical thanks for the answers. there is a difference between "typical computer moves" (not necessary bad) and mistakes. Several people have proven that Junior made some serious mistakes in the match, Kasparov too. Junior didnt succeed in keeping the initiative with white pieces. Kasparov equalized in all three games easily with black pieces. Yes, even in game 4. Much weaker player are able to do the same and they are happy with a draw. Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.