Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 08:48:19 02/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 15, 2003 at 09:31:08, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 15, 2003 at 08:10:30, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>On February 15, 2003 at 07:59:24, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On February 15, 2003 at 06:26:56, Drexel,Michael wrote: >>> >>>>On February 15, 2003 at 05:46:47, John Hill wrote: >>>> >>>>>I've been looking for an engine I can play at tournament time controls without >>>>>getting stomped (something stronger than the Sapphire II but weaker than >>>>>Crafty). I think Comet B27 fits the bill. It's one of the freebies included with >>>>>Chessbase programs. >>>>> >>>>>I can't find the older SSDF lists. Other sources suggest anywhere from >>>>>2390-2470. Any opinions on where it's at on a 1.2 Ghz? (Or any suggestions for >>>>>interesting programs meeting the stronger-than-Sapphire-weaker-than-Crafty >>>>>criterion. >>>>> >>>>>As great as it is to own GM-level programs, the only way I can play them is with >>>>>an average time setting and frequent adjournments (I presume this hybrid of OTB >>>>>and postal chess has become quite popular). >>>>> >>>>>Thanks, >>>> >>>>Actually Comet is not weaker than Crafty. >>>>Comet is one of the best freebies. >>>> >>>>http://www.chessbase.com/download/index.asp?cat=Engines >>>> >>>>I suggest to download Exchess 4.03 ~2100 >>>> or InmiChess ~2200 >>> >>>Exchess is stonger than Inmichess >>> >>>see http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/html/his1stedition.html >>>2nd division >>>8: ExChess 4.02 25.5 / 52 >>>10: InmiChess 3.05 21.5 / 52 >>> >>>see http://wbec-ridderkerk.nl/html/his2ndedition.html >>> >>>10: ExChess 4.03a 37.5 / 76 >>>15: InmiChess 3.05 31.5 / 76 >>> >>>Both program seem to have some bugs and Inmichess was thrown out of the >>>tournament when Exchess sometimes lose on time and it has 2 losses on time in >>>the last 2nd division(one against Movei). >>> >>>Uri >> >>I refered to Chessbase native engines Uri. >> >>The best-for-Fritz Ratinglist: >> >>http://www.beepworld.de/members38/lchristian/bff-liste.htm >> >>The bfF-Ratinglist is from CSS and therefore not independent. > >I think the games of Leo are more serious games. >That rating list is based on faster time control. > >I do not understand why a lot of winboard engines are there when Movei is not >there. > >Does Movei have a special problem with the Fritz interface that engines like >Genesis or Averno do not have? > >Uri I _do not know_ if this is a problem of Movei or a problem related with the buggy winboard adapter from Chessbase: If I set up a position Movei refuse to start. Furthermore Analyze mode does not work. Movei only shows the first move of pv when it hasto play against another engine. I will try to run movei in Fritz now with Malins WB2UCI adapter.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.