Author: blass uri
Date: 12:27:02 09/30/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 30, 1998 at 14:12:22, Alessio Iacovoni wrote: > What programs in the bast were basically lacking was a better positional >understanding.. now they have that (see HIARCS and basically all of the other >ones.. including the so called "fast searchers" such as Crafty) I see when I look at games that they have not positional understanding of simple things like pawns endgames they are also far from being perfect in the middle game. you can see the games in the match between kasparov and depper blue kasparov got positional advantage in some of the games in the middle games (games1,4,5). >, plus they have >an outstanding tactical capacity. they do not understand that the position that kasparov resigned to deeper blue is a draw and it proves that they have much to learn in tactics The only reason that they are close to be grandmasters is that grandmasters are weak and not that computer programs are strong. I see in games between computers that there are stupid mistakes that computer programs do Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.