Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The SSDF estimate is too high based on a mere 1.2 GHz !

Author: James T. Walker

Date: 17:59:35 02/15/03

Go up one level in this thread


On February 15, 2003 at 20:14:40, Sune Larsson wrote:

>On February 15, 2003 at 19:34:26, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>
>>If you consider that it took Deep Junior a Quad 1.9 GHz or 8 x 1.6 GHz to get a
>>draw score against Kasparov, then it is reasonable to suspect that Shredder 7
>>can NOT possibly get a SSDF of 2768 on a mere 1.2 GHz. Either the SSDF adjust
>>its rating by droping another 50 points or it is time to get an Athlon XP 2400+
>>to justify its inflated rating system.
>>
>>     THE SSDF RATING LIST 2003-02-13   90961 games played by  251 computers
>>                                           Rating   +     -  Games   Won  Oppo
>>                                           ------  ---   --- -----   ---  ----
>>   1 Shredder 7.0  256MB Athlon 1200 MHz     2768   33   -31   547   72%  2606
>>   2 Deep Fritz 7.0  256MB Athlon 1200 MHz   2760   29   -28   654   70%  2612
>>
>>
>>Pichard
>
>
>
> The SSDF numbers are not ELO numbers.
>
> /s

Really?  What are they?  Are they not calculated according to Arpad Elo's
suggestions?  They certainly are not FIDE ratings but why are they not Elo
ratings?
Jim



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.