Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 19:36:52 02/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 15, 2003 at 21:47:57, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >On February 13, 2003 at 23:51:38, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>I don't understand the "vaguely recall" nonsense. My only point of being > >Referring to the bottom of this post. > >http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?283867 > >Why would you have to guess? > >-Tom as I said, I only have _xeons_. You specifically asked about a PIII, and you did not say "PIII xeon". Yet my testing was on a PIII xeon. So that is why I said "I guess". Without a real PIII non-xeon I can't say that the ASM I wrote is good or bad or fair for a non-xeon. I've now said that three times. Is it still "confusing" somehow? When I can give you absolute data, I will say "it is X". When I am not sure, I will qualify it. I qualified the non-xeon statement for the reason given..
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.