Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 22:22:11 02/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 15, 2003 at 19:46:30, Chris Carson wrote: >On February 15, 2003 at 19:34:26, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>If you consider that it took Deep Junior a Quad 1.9 GHz or 8 x 1.6 GHz to get a >>draw score against Kasparov, then it is reasonable to suspect that Shredder 7 >>can NOT possibly get a SSDF of 2768 on a mere 1.2 GHz. Either the SSDF adjust >>its rating by droping another 50 points or it is time to get an Athlon XP 2400+ >>to justify its inflated rating system. >> >> THE SSDF RATING LIST 2003-02-13 90961 games played by 251 computers >> Rating + - Games Won Oppo >> ------ --- --- ----- --- ---- >> 1 Shredder 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2768 33 -31 547 72% 2606 >> 2 Deep Fritz 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2760 29 -28 654 70% 2612 >> >> >>Pichard > >Human (FIDE Rated) vs Computer (Match and Tournament) > > Opp > TPR ELO W D L Tot >C. Tiger 14 P3 866 MHz 2788 2497 8 3 0 11 >CMaster 8K P3 700 MHz 2750 2350 2 0 0 2 > >Slower HW? How can that be? > >Best Regards, >Chris Carson When Chess Tiger 14 played against humans back in Argentina, the humans GMs according to them never played against the beast. If you match them again using a P4 3.06 GHz, you will NOT notice much of a difference, even using CT 15.0 against the same group of GMs from Argentina. Pichard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.