Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: The SSDF estimate is too high based on a mere 1.2 GHz !

Author: Rajen Gupta

Date: 02:39:09 02/16/03

Go up one level in this thread

rather than call these scores"ELO" lets take them for what they really are
"SSDF" points; and all they measure is the relative performance of a computer vs
another. this way even if it reaches 3000 in  a couple of years we will not tear
out hair over whether they are actually 3000 ELO or not

On February 15, 2003 at 19:34:26, Jorge Pichard wrote:

>If you consider that it took Deep Junior a Quad 1.9 GHz or 8 x 1.6 GHz to get a
>draw score against Kasparov, then it is reasonable to suspect that Shredder 7
>can NOT possibly get a SSDF of 2768 on a mere 1.2 GHz. Either the SSDF adjust
>its rating by droping another 50 points or it is time to get an Athlon XP 2400+
>to justify its inflated rating system.
>

• Re: The SSDF estimate is too high based on a mere 1.2 GHz ! Joshua Lee 09:02:37 02/17/03
  • Re: The SSDF estimate is too high based on a mere 1.2 GHz ! Dann Corbit 15:56:38 02/17/03
    • Re: The SSDF estimate is too high based on a mere 1.2 GHz ! Charles Worthington 12:26:42 02/18/03
      • Re: The SSDF estimate is too high based on a mere 1.2 GHz ! Uri Blass 12:50:01 02/18/03
        • To Uri Charles Worthington 13:21:04 02/18/03
          • Re: To Uri Uri Blass 13:29:47 02/18/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.