Author: Peter Berger
Date: 04:07:57 02/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 16, 2003 at 18:19:40, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On February 16, 2003 at 18:13:42, Peter Berger wrote: > >>On February 16, 2003 at 17:59:14, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>On February 16, 2003 at 17:48:19, Peter Berger wrote: >>> >>>>No Rolf, my comment is only about chess - I am convinced that Nxg4 is simply the >>>>very strongest move and everything else is garbage. Feel welcome to challenge >>>>this assessment with analysis either of your own or published one - but please >>>>don't forget to add another move that leads to at least a position of similar >>>>merit. >>>> >>>>I think Nxg4 is a very good example for a move played by a computer that looks >>>>weak to amateurs unless they spend a lot of time looking at the position and has >>>>the potential to even fool players of higher strength. It looks messy, but is >>>>strong. >>>> >>>>Regards, >>>>Peter >>> >>> >>>Ok, let's take only that chess question. You say the move is fantastic? >> >>OK ;) - yes I actually do in fact. >> >>So it >>>wins? I say it is a bad LINE and perhaps Nxg4 is the "best" move. But it is >>>still in a bad line. Michael said Black must avoid the 0-0. Read his message. He >>>also gives the neccessary moves. I won't imposter with his moves. >>> >> >>I have analyzed the game - I didn't follow the thread you are referring to. >>Please point me to the post you want to discuss. >> >>Thanks in advance. >>Peter > > >http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?284683 OK - I get your point now. First you said that Sxg4 was a horrible move - here I contradicted as I disagree and think it is the only and best move. I didn't expect you to change topics so fast For an expert opinion about Nxg4: http://www.worldchessrating.com/522004712.html?282334552146494 Now you say you want to discuss O-O and think this is a very weak move not worthy of a super-grandmaster. I agree that this move might be bad, although I don't think it is that horrible at all - I have seen much worse played by human super-grandmasters. Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.