Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 10:08:31 02/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 17, 2003 at 12:24:25, Joshua Lee wrote: >Technically speaking Deep Blue performance wise is 'Stronger' as it earned a >2862 performance rating in 1997 , both programs are/ were great and are capable >of playing a GM worthy game.... not on every move but who knows when that will >happen. Since some people still consider the Blue's 'Stronger' what makes them >'Stronger' at chess and IF that was programed into your average program what >does it change about how chess is played? > >Explain what each function does if you will. How can anyone do this. Deep Junior's source is not available. Only bits and pieces of what Deep Blue had "knowledge-wise" has been published. So how can you compare two things that have so little information available about them?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.