Author: James Robertson
Date: 18:39:47 09/30/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 30, 1998 at 14:03:26, Danniel Corbit wrote: >On September 30, 1998 at 13:33:13, Komputer Korner wrote: >[snip] >>I agree with Jouni. Even though the Fritz 3D has perfect rendering of shadows >>and depth, it's actual pieces are not lifelike enough. Perfect 3D should look >>like a real set of pieces and the pieces in Fritz 5 do not fit the bill. The >>best I have seen is the 3D set in CS TAL. CM 6000 comes next. >The best 3-D board is projection of one onto a plane (a 2-D one). 3-D boards >are all lame and horrible. I am even to the point now that I like a nice 2-D >board better than the real thing! I doubt seriously if I shall ever like any >computer rendered 3-D board. I wish the software manufacturers would stop >wasting time on crap like that an put some energy into the database. I agree...... Every 3D board I have ever seen stinks. James
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.