Author: Alastair Scott
Date: 01:38:32 02/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 17, 2003 at 14:41:34, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >the elo system has no defined 0. results are only defined in terms of wins and >losses. For example, suppose one defined the average elo to be 1600, and placed >Kramnik, Kasparov, and Shirov in a room together and had them play 5000 games. >Kasparov's rating would be 1650 at best. Or we could define the 0 to be 0 - >Kasparov would have a rating of 1200, and some people would have negative >rating! The whole thing is just like potential energy in physics: only >differences in the rating system are meaningful. Excellent explanation, and there is also the Flynn effect (such rating systems tend to progressively inflate the numbers over time), which I believe has never been explained. Alastair
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.