Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: To Michael Drexel

Author: Drexel,Michael

Date: 12:27:55 02/18/03

Go up one level in this thread

On February 18, 2003 at 14:44:10, Charles Worthington wrote:

>Actually the 3175 kNs was derived at from a mathmatical formula: 1200 kNs for
>single 3.06 cpu times 1.85 (For Duals) then that figure times 1.33 for
>hyperthreading. Until I have the system in hand to test it the math is all i
>have to go by. Why hasnt anyone tested the dual 2.8 Xeons by now? They have
>certainly been on the market long enough that someone here would have tested
>them other than Bob.

Unfortunately Bob dont like to install Fritz 7 or Fritz 8. I assume he only
would have to send chessbase a mail and they would ship him all products for
free.
He is probably Winboard-Crafty Fan :)
CC enthusiasts in Germany generally prefer Dual AMD systems. So do I

• Re: To Michael Drexel Charles Worthington 12:35:37 02/18/03
  • Money no object? What about s390? Matthew Hull 12:57:03 02/18/03
    • Re: Money no object? What about s390? Robert Hyatt 13:41:44 02/18/03
      • Re: Money no object? What about s390? Matthew Hull 13:43:58 02/18/03
        • Re: Money no object? What about s390? Robert Hyatt 15:06:48 02/18/03

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.