Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 14:51:52 02/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 2003 at 17:47:02, Chessfun wrote: >On February 18, 2003 at 17:09:08, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On February 18, 2003 at 16:57:59, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On February 15, 2003 at 15:38:30, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>> >>>>On February 15, 2003 at 15:26:13, Chessfun wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 15, 2003 at 14:52:10, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On February 15, 2003 at 14:34:31, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Answer me this, What Difference Does it make if you play more >>>>>>>>positional chess, if you cannot defeated me?? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>If that were the case, I would agree. But by the same token, do you want >>>>>>>your program to play 30 brilliant moves and one lemon move, over and over? >>>>>>>That one lemon will drag your performance _way_ down at the top of the rating >>>>>>>scale. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Bob, may I point out with humility that this is exactly my weak-chain argument? >>>>>>Finally we are on the point. Did you ever reflect what would happen if >>>>>> >>>>>> - in a really recompensating money atmosphere and >>>>>> >>>>>> - after top players adopted specific comp related chess? >>>>>> >>>>>>And that on the base of a known permanent weakness? >>>>>> >>>>>>That is the point. And not the typical hype based on show events /commercials. >>>>>> >>>>>>What is you impression with the GM play on ICC? But note, Roman D. had to face >>>>>>an always changed version [on the base of his own hints]. Guess what will happen >>>>>>if several top GM work hard on a counter strategy against comps, in other words >>>>>>if GM adopt 'Eduard'... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>You clearly have no clue as to what actually happens. >>>> >>>> >>>>Note that nobody here must come with humility! It was a bit irony by me. But - >>>>you are a bit too respectless. Why? >>>> >>>>Here you completely miss my point. You should read it again and always think >>>>about tournament times. Not Blitz. >>> >>>You seem to have finally answered your own question. >>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?285129 >>> >>>Sarah >> >>I don't understand what you might possibly mean. Because here to you and there >>to Matthew Hull I always said the same. Bob can't have spoken about tournament >>chess. Crafty is NOT playing tournament chess on ICC. So you are wrong and also >>Matthew is wrong because he wanted to take Bob as if he had said that for >>tournament chess they are GM. Wrong - Bob said the opposite. >> >>Let's wait until Bob says what he meant. :) >> >>Rolf Tueschen > > >In this thread you ask about Crafties performance against GM's, then state you >meant at Tournament times. Then you acknowledge in another thread Crafty don't >play tournament times. You are making me nervous. Not I said that but Matthew. Then I opposed. He insisted and then indeed I asked Bob. But originally I did not ask Bob. :) Ionescu. Rolf Tueschen > >Matters not whether Dr. Hyatt says it does or it doesn't. > >Sarah. > > > > >>> >>>> >>>>>Roman may be good against comps and there are other GM's and IM's that are, and >>>>>there are also many, that try daily over and over and over and simply see loss >>>>>after loss after loss. >>>>> >>>>>Scrappy has been playing jnogueiras who is GM Jesús Nogueiras Santiago >>>>>for days and scrappy has been slaughtering him. While IM Alexis Cabrera handle >>>>>Minotauro has for the most part scored about even. >>>>> >>>>>Point being that some maybe able to adapt their game to an anti-computer type >>>>>play (trading pieces etc) others never manage despite playing endlessly. >>>>> >>>>>Sarah. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Only then, and that is my argument since long, the actual commercial progs begin >>>>>>to SUCK. But on a permanent base! >>>>>> >>>>>>My questions to Amir went a bit in the same direction. Let's see how far the >>>>>>experts can open their mind. >>>>>> >>>>>>Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.