Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:45:59 02/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2003 at 11:12:37, Roy Brunjes wrote: >On February 19, 2003 at 00:50:04, James T. Walker wrote: > >>On February 18, 2003 at 22:57:47, Charles Worthington wrote: >> >>>I am cosidering making Crafty my primary engine for 3+2 and under games on the >>>chessbase server. Does anyone have blitz stats (ie. w-l-d) for crafty vs various >>>other engines? >> >>In my opinion Crafty is not a good blitzer. It appears to me that Crafty has >>become better at longer time controls and worse at short time controls in the >>last few years. The only info I have on Crafty is for Crafty 18.13 which scored >>101 out of 278 games at G/5min vs various top programs in my blitz database. I >>have Crafty 19.01 scoreing only 37.5 out of 100 games vs Deep Sjeng Beta on 2 >>XP2400+ machines using auto232 (G/5min). I don't own a dual. >>Jim > >Hmm... 101/278 is roughly 36.3 percent for Crafty 18.13. That is not even as >good as the 37.5 points that Crafty 19.01 has. Granted, the sample size is much >smaller for 19.01 than for 18.13, but is that data sufficient to clearly declare >18.13 as better at blitz? > >Roy Comparison is wrong because 18.13 played against verious top programs when 19.01 played against Deep Sjeng Beta. I do not know the level of Deep Sjeng Beta relative to verious top programs to compare. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.