Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Isn't Kramnik the world champion title holder?

Author: Carlos Lantigua

Date: 09:25:24 02/19/03

Go up one level in this thread


On February 19, 2003 at 02:02:24, Russell Reagan wrote:

>On February 19, 2003 at 00:35:21, stuart taylor wrote:
>
>>On February 18, 2003 at 23:28:37, Carlos Lantigua wrote:
>>
>>>Buenos Aires will be by 2nd time venue of world chess championship(In 1927
>>>Alekhine defeated Capablanca in Buenos Aires). Kasparov got what he wanted
>>>although he lost his honor by joining what he called his enemy Iliuzinov.
>>
>>So why is Kasparov involved in world championship?
>>S.Taylor
>
>It's like a "unification" fight in boxing. There are currently two claims to the
>world championship of chess. FIDE and the "private title", which is held by
>Kramnik. So they're going to settle this nonsense and have a little tournament.
>Kasparov is going to play Ponomariov, and Kramnik is going to play Leko. The
>winners of the two matches will play each other for the "world championship". I
>think it would be great fun to see Ponomariov and Leko play :) But that is
>probably not likely, and Kasparov will win it back.
Russel, when GK said Kramnik will be his challenger i said Kasparov will lose
the title cause Kramnik was the only player able to beat him, chessplayers
friends of mine though i was kidding but the time proved i was right. In case
the rematch of GK-Kramnik take place i´ll bet again in favor of Kramnik.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.