Author: James T. Walker
Date: 10:25:24 02/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2003 at 13:00:58, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 19, 2003 at 12:42:14, James T. Walker wrote: > >>On February 19, 2003 at 12:38:09, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On February 19, 2003 at 12:33:45, James T. Walker wrote: >>> >>>>Is this the tourney you quote? "1st Division, 2nd edition WBEC Ridderkerk" As I >>>>read it, it's not finished. In it Comet has played only one game vs Crafty and >>>>no games vs Yace. Look at the cross table. Comet has 44.5 and Crafty has 40 >>>>points. >>>>Jim >>> >>>I think that I understand your misunderstanding. >>> >>>The games that were not played by your understanding are draws by my >>>understanding. >>> >>>= means draw and not missing game. >>> >>>Uri >> >>OK. Thanks for making that clear. Does this mean that Comet is better than >>Crafty at 40/40? What would prove your point. Give me a scenario and I will >>give it a try. >>Jim > >My point was only that the difference between crafty and Comet is very small at >long time control when crafty is clearly better than Comet at Blitz. > >Uri This may only prove that Comet is a very poor blitzer Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.