Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:34:00 02/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2003 at 13:25:24, James T. Walker wrote: >On February 19, 2003 at 13:00:58, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On February 19, 2003 at 12:42:14, James T. Walker wrote: >> >>>On February 19, 2003 at 12:38:09, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On February 19, 2003 at 12:33:45, James T. Walker wrote: >>>> >>>>>Is this the tourney you quote? "1st Division, 2nd edition WBEC Ridderkerk" As I >>>>>read it, it's not finished. In it Comet has played only one game vs Crafty and >>>>>no games vs Yace. Look at the cross table. Comet has 44.5 and Crafty has 40 >>>>>points. >>>>>Jim >>>> >>>>I think that I understand your misunderstanding. >>>> >>>>The games that were not played by your understanding are draws by my >>>>understanding. >>>> >>>>= means draw and not missing game. >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>OK. Thanks for making that clear. Does this mean that Comet is better than >>>Crafty at 40/40? What would prove your point. Give me a scenario and I will >>>give it a try. >>>Jim >> >>My point was only that the difference between crafty and Comet is very small at >>long time control when crafty is clearly better than Comet at Blitz. >> >>Uri > >This may only prove that Comet is a very poor blitzer >Jim Or that crafty is relatively better at blitz. Every thing is relative. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.