Author: Charles Worthington
Date: 11:56:06 02/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2003 at 11:50:42, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On February 18, 2003 at 02:54:19, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>Dual Athlon 1900+ 1590 kn/s >> >>PIV 3.06 GHz 1310 kn/s > > > >That says it all. duals will be 2620. Factor in another 20-30% for >hyper-threading >and he will get there. 2620 * 1.2 (20%)=3144K, 2620*1.3 (30%)=3406K. His 3M >is certainly within reach and then some, and his xeon has a bigger cache IIRC >(512K >vs 256K) > Thank you Bob for confirming my math. It's nice to see that someone can still do the math and come up with same figures I do. Of course math doesn't lie. At the very least I will get my 2500-2600 even if the hyperthreading didn't exist. But since it_does_exist and since it_will_exceed the conservative 1.2 multiplier I tend to agree with you. It just seems so unreal to look at those figures. The machine that fought Kramnik was not that fast even. I guess I have gotten used to seeing so many 2200 kNs duals on the server that the reality of it wont hit me until i see the benchmark. Most intel tests indicate a hyperthreading multiplier of 1.33 to 1.37 for applications that are good with utilizing multiple threads....which fritz certainly is. >> >>Athlon XP2800+ 1230 kn/s >> >>Athlon XP2600+ 1160 kn/s >> >>Athlon XP2400+ 1100 kn/s >> >>PIV 2.67 GHz 1070 kn/s >> >>Athlon XP2100+ 960 kn/s >> >>Athlon XP2000+ 940 kn/s >> >>Athlon XP1900+ 900 kn/s >> >>PIV 2.26 GHz 880 kn/s >> >>Athlon XP1800+ 830 kn/s >> >>Athlon XP1700+ 805 kn/s >> >>PIV 2.0 GHz 780 kn/s >> >>Athlon 1400C 770 kn/s >> >>Celeron 1500 760 kn/s >> >>Celeron 1400 690 kn/s >> >>PIV 1.8 GHz 660 kn/s >> >>Duron 1300 640 kn/s >> >>Celeron 1200 560 kn/s >> >>Intel PIII,1Ghz 540 kn/s >> >>Athlon 900 470 kn/s >> >>Celeron 600 295 kn/s >> >> >> >>F7,DF7 64 MB Hash >> >> >>I could easily reach >3000 rating with my XP 2000+ on Playchess server, simply >>by preparing a special opening book. >>Others cheat and play with 2 machines and two Internet connections to get a high >>rating. >>What for?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.