Author: Yen Art Tham
Date: 13:50:25 02/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2003 at 00:28:23, Aaron Gordon wrote: >On February 19, 2003 at 00:16:01, Charles Worthington wrote: > >>On February 19, 2003 at 00:11:08, Aaron Gordon wrote: >> >>>I just downloaded Crafty 16.19 and ran a bench for you guys. No single cpu Intel >>>box could ever touch this without sub-zero cooling. Just plain not going to >>>happen. >>> >>>Crafty v16.19 >>> >>>White(1): bench >>>Running benchmark. . . >>>...... >>>Total nodes: 67136136 >>>Raw nodes per second: 1766740 >>>Total elapsed time: 38 >>>SMP time-to-ply measurement: 16.842105 >> >> >>I am unfamiliar with Crafty figures so I have no reference point. Could you >>please run the test on deep fritz 7 or fritz 8 so i have a frame of reference? >>Thanks! > >I prefer testing with Crafty because I have optimized binaries for each cpu I >run the test on. When I run it on a P4 the P4 uses a binary optimized >specifically for the P4. When I run it on an AthlonXP the AthlonXP gets a binary >optimized for it, too. This way it's completely fair. Without two seperate >optimized copies of Fritz I don't consider the results meaningful. I have >however run the Fritz8mark for you anyway. Here are my results.. > >XP 2100+ (1.73GHz) at 2440MHz, 128mb hash >1571 Fritz8Mark (5.2s) >1222kN/s Results with F8 or DF7 are_meaningful_to people who uses them. On playchess hardly anybody play with Crafty; so results with Crafty are not very meaningful to them.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.