Author: Matt Taylor
Date: 13:51:27 02/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2003 at 13:04:10, Peter Kasinski wrote: >On February 19, 2003 at 12:36:56, Mike Byrne wrote: > >>On February 19, 2003 at 11:22:18, Matt Taylor wrote: >> >>>On February 19, 2003 at 06:55:04, Mike Byrne wrote: >>> >>>>On February 18, 2003 at 23:39:18, Aaron Gordon wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hyatts box benchmarks a little over 2 million nodes/sec in the crafty benchmark. >>>>>Hyatt, I know you say you get 2.5 million but in all the games you've played >>>>>online where you've kibbed your nodes/sec you've ALWAYS been just over 2 million >>>>>(2050-2150kn/s most of the time). Also, about a dual P4-3.06 + HT getting 3 >>>>>million nodes/sec. Not going to happen (Possible in the endgame with almost no >>>>>pieces). My AthlonXP 2100+ overclocked to 2.44GHz gets a little over 1.5 million >>>>>nodes/sec in crafty and I've seen over 2 million in end-games. Enricos 2400+ @ >>>>>2.52GHz gets almost 1.6 million in crafty. >>>>> >>>>>There are *NO* P4 chips available that can match this, including a P4-3.06 Xeon >>>>>+ HT. Those get around 1.3 million WITH HT in crafty. If you do a 1.3 million * >>>>>1.8 you come out to 2.34 million nodes/sec. Far cry from 3 million nodes/sec. >>>>> >>>>>How much did MY box cost? $97 for the chip, $80 for the board. $75 for the ram, >>>>>etc. Not much at all. >>>> >>>>Disagree totally, I already get 1.5M NPS in many positions on a dual 1.8 Ghz, 3M >>>>NPS is very do-able with dual 3.06 Hgz and Hyper threading IMO. We will see >>>>soon enough. >>>> >>>>Michael >>> >>>I believe Aaron is talking about the benchmark specifically, not just easy >>>positions. Do you claim to have 1.5M NPS in the benchmark? With stock >>>configuration? >>> >>>-Matt >> >> >>Benchmark will be hard to make 3M on 3.06 Ghz I believe, I did not understand >>that to be the question. I don't do the bench very often - but on my machine it >>is around 800-900K NPS depending on version and how well I compile. I will >>check tonight and post results. But I do see 1.5M nps quite often. >> >>Michael > >I get 1.3M doing benchmark for 19.02 on PIV 3.06GHz. The 1.4-1.5 mark is reached >frequently in late-middlegame positions (after castling, queens off). > >PK Aaron is using 18.12. I'd like to get him to use a newer build. I'm looking into doing some AMD optimization for Crafty. If that turns out well, I'll run the latest on my 3 Athlon-based boxes. Until then I'm not comparing my numbers because I think it is a tad unfair to pit a compiler against Eugene. :-) -Matt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.