Author: James T. Walker
Date: 14:39:53 02/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2003 at 13:34:00, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 19, 2003 at 13:25:24, James T. Walker wrote: > >>On February 19, 2003 at 13:00:58, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On February 19, 2003 at 12:42:14, James T. Walker wrote: >>> >>>>On February 19, 2003 at 12:38:09, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 19, 2003 at 12:33:45, James T. Walker wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Is this the tourney you quote? "1st Division, 2nd edition WBEC Ridderkerk" As I >>>>>>read it, it's not finished. In it Comet has played only one game vs Crafty and >>>>>>no games vs Yace. Look at the cross table. Comet has 44.5 and Crafty has 40 >>>>>>points. >>>>>>Jim >>>>> >>>>>I think that I understand your misunderstanding. >>>>> >>>>>The games that were not played by your understanding are draws by my >>>>>understanding. >>>>> >>>>>= means draw and not missing game. >>>>> >>>>>Uri >>>> >>>>OK. Thanks for making that clear. Does this mean that Comet is better than >>>>Crafty at 40/40? What would prove your point. Give me a scenario and I will >>>>give it a try. >>>>Jim >>> >>>My point was only that the difference between crafty and Comet is very small at >>>long time control when crafty is clearly better than Comet at Blitz. >>> >>>Uri >> >>This may only prove that Comet is a very poor blitzer >>Jim > >Or that crafty is relatively better at blitz. > >Every thing is relative. > >Uri That's why you have to compare to many programs and not just pick out one program to compare to another. Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.