Author: Charles Worthington
Date: 19:11:42 02/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2003 at 22:03:36, Aaron Gordon wrote: >On February 19, 2003 at 21:46:55, Charles Worthington wrote: > >>I wasnt speaking of performance i was speaking mainly of purpose. Do you feel >>that AMD honestly markets their product and condones the ridiculous overclocking >> figures that we see here? Perhaps I will write AMD and post their reply here. > >Of course they don't like overclocking. Tell me this though, you really think >there's going to be a massive difference from a 2800+ (2250MHz) and my 2506MHz >cpu? 256MHz isn't a lot. I assure you two of those chips would mop the floor >with anything Intel has. You can get the chips for cheap, too. Just buy two >AthlonXP 2800+'s and connect the 5th L5 bridge to enable SMP mode. Now you've >got two 2800+ MP chips. Of couse you are comparing the chip to an intel which isnt overclocked. Not exactly a fair comparison. If it is so easy to build these sperfast AMDs then why are they not on the chessbase server posting 2600kNs with deep fritz 7? That is all I'm asking. I here talk here of "super chips" but we are not seeing the results posted here out in the field. Please explain why.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.