Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 04:15:56 02/20/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 20, 2003 at 06:58:53, Sune Fischer wrote: >On February 20, 2003 at 06:37:11, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On February 19, 2003 at 18:53:47, Sune Fischer wrote: >> >>>We can't compare ratings over time, but since all the GMs acknowledge Kasparov >>>to be the greates ever, it is only natural if he also has the highest rating >>>ever. I don't see any real hard evidence the scale is drifting unwarrented, then >>>again there is no reason why it should remain the same, but whether it has gone >>>up or down I can't say. I believe average strength has increased a little bit, >>>so even if the scale has "drifted" a bit upwards I wouldn't call it inflation >>>but rather a natural adjustment. :) >>> >>>-S. >> >>The whole paragraphe is full of errors. Kasparov is NOT the best ever. This is >>NONSENSE. His 2800 or whatever are NOT better than say Alekhine's best numbers. > >And I'm sure you are perfectly capable of making that judgement knowing more >about chess than anyone else on the planet. > >>You don't get it. You don't read what Bob says. Look at Alekhie's tournament >>wins and you knowe that today Alekhine might have Kasparovs number or even >>better. > >Alkehine was great for his time, but in absoluteness he is probably stomped by >GK (according to the words of other GM's, don't take my word for it!:). > >>Because Alekhine wasn't such a over-sensitive, but then he drank too >>much. :) > >And by that you are trying to argue... what? > >>Alo your average strength that increased a little bit, that is a delusion! > >Who said it increased? >If so, why would it be a little bit? ROFL! Good morning, Sune, my dearest. _You_ said that. Please raise your eyes - good - now read what you wrote above. Hehe. As I said, memory is the _base_ of all. Rolf Tueschen (Planet Champion of Three-Human-Brain with Kasparov, Kramnik & Rolf) >And why would it be an illision? > >You assume too much Rolf, you know next to nothing, please keep that in mind. > >>But >>go on, you are in consent with the spin doctors who compare chess or was it >>computerchess with boxing and who call Kasparov the best of the PLANET. :) > >Sure, most of the top GM's are in on one giant conspiracy to belittle Alekhine >and make Kasparov out to be much better than he really is. >Nice fantasy Rolf, Earth calling. > >-S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.