Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Good proof for the impossibility to improve one's Intelligence

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 04:31:02 02/20/03

Go up one level in this thread


On February 20, 2003 at 07:18:40, Sune Fischer wrote:

>On February 20, 2003 at 06:02:40, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>>
>>the moment you could understand that you are unable to understand what Bob is
>>talking about, you are NOT more intelligent but you have learned how to give
>>less unqualified statements.
>
>Rolf, the moment you would learn how to join a conversation....
>You start out by a rude condecending remark, completely without foundation.
>
>You are deliberately trying to pick a fight with me, well this time I'm not
>falling for it. And please don't excuse by your english is not very good, I'm
>not falling for that one either.
>
>I will leave you alone with your trolls.
>We can talk when you've grown up.
>
>Take care now, bye bye.
>-S.


I apologize for having used the term intelligence in a thread about the
difference between intelligence and performance. Yes I was making a logical
argument of a very high smartness ad I had only one hope - that you might join
Bobby and me. But now we've lost you, please be confirmed that I didn't want to
lose you. I'd wished you would thank me for my efforts. Look, I had the thread
before my eyes and I could see what you couldn't understand although Bob tried
his best. But of course this is not on beginners level here. Otherwise Bob could
always had said, no, you are wrong, go back to chapter one. This whole topic is
NOT about language difficulties but about statistics. Basics of it. But don't
worry, unless a little minority nobody has studied statistics. I HAVE. So that
already proves you're wrong with your childish reaction.

Rolf Tueschen



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.