Author: Matt Taylor
Date: 12:02:12 02/20/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 20, 2003 at 08:18:08, Andrew R. Case wrote: >On February 20, 2003 at 00:04:43, Matt Taylor wrote: > >>On February 19, 2003 at 21:43:10, Charles Worthington wrote: >> >>>On February 19, 2003 at 20:59:19, Charles Worthington wrote: >>> >>>>On February 19, 2003 at 20:58:20, Charles Worthington wrote: >>>> >>>>>Yes Matt many people here do exagerate their figures. If the Intel guy says >>>>>Intel will produce a 20 GHz cpu next week then the AMD guy will tell you that he >>>>>can still clock his 2600 to 20.1GHz....and vice versa. The truth is that they >>>>>are both good processors. Is the AMD on par with the Xeon in quality or speed? >>>>>No, it isn't. The 2.8 Xeon was tested alongside the AMD 2400MP and clearly >>>>>out-scored it. The tests were performed by an independant company who had no >>>>>reason to lie. Yes as far as speed goes they can both be clocked up. But people >>>>>should try to bear in mind that the AMD and the Xeon are very different products >>>>>designed for very different markets. The Zeon is primarily designed for >>>>>workstation and server platforms where both speed ans stability are required. >>>>>They are high end processors and are priced accordingly. The Athlon is designed >>>>>more for use in PC's both single cpu (xp) and dual (Mp). It is a fast processor >>>>>for the buck but was not designed to be overclocked to try to match a Xeon. If a >>>>>2 GHz cpu was stable at 3 GHz then, trust me, AMD would market it as a 3 GHz. >>>>>The bottom line is simple: If you want performance and stability and you can >>>>>afford to pay for it buy the Xeon. If you want performance but are on a limited >>>>>budget buy the AMD. But_don't_ go out and buy a Yugo and then come back here and >>>>>tell me that you are building it to catch the neighbors Ferrari. If the >>>>>neighbors Ferrari bothers you that much then buy one too. If you can't afford >>>>>one then be happy with the yugo. It will still get you where you are going. >>>>> To me trying to compare Intel and AMD is like comparing apples and oranges. >>>>>You are comparing a low end home and light business processor against a high end >>>>>heavy duty cpu designed specifically for Workstation and server platforms. That >>>>>is like comparing a Yugo to a Ferrari. >>> >>>Charles >>> >>> >>>P.S. The figures for Deep Fritz 7 that I have observed on the chessbase server >>>are as follows: 2.2GHz P4 750kNs; 2.8GHz P4 1038 kNs; 3.06GHz P4 w/HT 1,297kNs. >>>AMD 2400xp 1030 kNs; Dual AMD 2400mp 2280kNs; Dual AMD 2400xp 2166 kNs. I have >>>played against or observed most every dual on that site. I did see one machine >>>post 2400 kNs but that was only once and may have been during a spike. I am >>>unsure of the type cpu which produced that figure. I have seen overclocking >>>claims here so wild as to defy belief. I have seen claims of single cpu AMD's >>>pulling 1,800 kNs with Deep Fritz 7 (without any way of hyperthreading). They >>>need to put that in a dual then come to the chessbase server and let us all see >>>the 3300 kNs post. Of course they won't do this because they cant make that >>>post. It is easy to post figures on here where no one can prove or disprove them >>>but it's not so easy to prove it over the board on the chessbase server. The >>>figures i have posted above were with 64 MB Hash tables in 3+2 time controls. >>>And yes, some of those AMD dual machines are overclocked the owners have told me >>>so themselves. The above figures are how it is in the real world. They are >>>unbiased and accurate. And i challenge any AMD here overclocked or not to show >>>all of us on the fritz server than he can exceed 2600 kNs with Deep Fritz 7. >>>Forget posting the benchmarks here...let the chessbase server do that. And be >>>sure to use the Deep Fritz 7 GUI and send evaluations. The kNs will be posted at >>>the end of every game. >> >>AthlonMP 2600 is available. Comparing AthlonMP 2400 to P4 3.06 GHz isn't exactly >>fair, is it? >> >>-Matt > > Sure it is, nobody has a dual 2600MP yet....that is the problem Nobody has a dual 3.06 either. I have not seen the 3.06 sold yet, though I suppose Dell has them. I can order an MP 2600 right now if I want to. -Matt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.