Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why on earth ...

Author: James T. Walker

Date: 22:11:45 02/20/03

Go up one level in this thread


On February 20, 2003 at 15:39:32, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On February 20, 2003 at 14:02:33, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>... is almost everbody playing [rather meaningless?] blitz games 5m/game or even
>>less?? With hardware 3-5 times faster than today, we shall soon see matches at
>>1m/game. And then it will be high time for me to find a new hobby, grrrr ....
>
>Here are nearly 4000 games at slow time control:
>ftp://cap.connx.com/The%20Gauntlet/contest/
>
>I share your dislike of blitz.  In the same way, some people will prefer a hot
>dog and soda to steak and champaign.
>*shrug*

I definitely like a hot dog and soda over steak and champaign.  :-)  I also like
blitz by computers since they still play better chess at blitz than most people
play at 40/2.  What's a couple more plies (more or less)?  Actually I love the
beauty of postal chess games but don't have the patience for it.  Some are
amazing to play over.
"To each his own"
Jim



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.