Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Dangers in CC - SSDF: Terminology, Statistics

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 03:15:29 02/21/03

Go up one level in this thread


On February 21, 2003 at 06:02:26, Jonas Cohonas wrote:

>You do know that the SSDF does not claim to be 100% accurate right??
>
>Jonas

I know what they wrote, and simply read the advertisement now for SHREDDER, that
a new program had climbed number one place. Exactly that is not only inaccurate
but simply plain false! And not by a slim margin but with a big number! Note
that they had a difference of 8 points and tht with >30 points incertitude.

Ok, I answered you here but all others please have a bit of understanding that I
can't reply on all the usual claque. Hey, I also do like SSDF! And it tears my
heart in two when I see what they are doing and how they "defend" the
impossible. But please I am not the official who now must defend scientifical
trivialities. So, unless I see a really heavy weight argument, I want to abstain
from debates.

Rolf Tueschen



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.