Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 03:49:19 02/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2003 at 01:23:01, Stephen A. Boak wrote: >>On February 20, 2003 at 11:41:16, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>The question here is more >>a psychological one. Not mathematical. > >I agree, but I'm not a professional psychologist to know the exact name for the >condition. > >>You are the name calling evil boy. Who wrote: Earth to Rolf. Who wrote: Rolfs >>war game? You want to creat a case with you as a victim. What a nonsense when >>you are the evil side. I visited this thread to make reasonable logical >>arguments. > >Ironical that you can dish out irony when it is an 'easy out' but you can't take >it when it is dished out to you. This isn't 'overly sensitive' but simply >paranoid. When you dish out irony, you use it to excuse yourself. When you >receive irony, it is somehow completely evil. >Projection, projection, projection. > >I take it back, this isn't ironical at all. Irony presupposes a certain bit of >'surprise', 'humor' or 'chagrin'. Here, it is totally expected & humorless >under the circumstances, so I guess no emotion should apply and there is no >basis for true irony after all. My mistake. More pathos than anything. > >True social behavior (as opposed to anti-social behavior) begins when you >realize you don't always have to have the last word, when you realize you don't >always have to 'be right'. When you forget perceived insults and realize it is >your own sensitivity and probably not the true intention of your percieved >antagonist to hurt you. Then you can make real progress (and friends). > >Sadly, I think you truely lack the capacity to understand your condition. >Nevertheless I sincerely hope that isn't the case. I think the best thing for >you would be to lose one of your internal arguments. Always winning leads to >megalomaniacal behavior. > >Come on, Rolf. Show your better side. Don't try to be so perfect. >Perfectionism is itself a flaw. > >Use stats, not sticks. Calm not warring words. Help not hurt. Don't think >your own definitions are always the right ones for someone else--that is very >condescending. Arguments are never won by condescending words, nor is it >usually conducive to persuasion. You reap what you sow. Use bitter irony and >you will reap bitter replies (in many cases)--why sow for sorrow. > >Take care. Hope you take a needed break (my opinion, don't blame Sune or anyone >else) and come back please when things are better--you would be very welcome. Obituary? Too early, my priest. This is clearly a case of: ejaculatio praecox. But thanks for the effort. :) Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.