Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 05:05:09 02/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2003 at 07:51:57, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >No matter what statistics say, they don't change the fact that the list was >never intended to constitute who is THE number 1, and there is the culprit in >your critique. This is the only "argument" worth a response. All other stuff is off-topic personal attacks. Tony Hedlund, perhaps you heard the name before, just hast confirmed me that this tradition - right from the begining - is the most important reason for SSDF. Presenting a new number one all two months. And the truth is that sometimes this is simply impossible to do. And then they can't do it. But as we can see they still do it. And this is against the Law of stats. To give the most important law for a rating list. If you now want to talk about the next Everest expedition, feel free, but don't expect me to comment unless you pretend that due to less oxygen the Everest is in reality only 7200 meters high. Then I will prove that that is a delusion. The same with the number one Shredder. Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.