Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 05:44:14 02/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2003 at 08:33:18, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >On February 21, 2003 at 08:27:23, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On February 21, 2003 at 08:18:17, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>>BTW can you prove that Shredder is not number 1?, beyond any shadow of a doubt >>>that is. >> >> >>Yes I can. Look, the three progs at the top are eqally qualified for number one. >>Here is my decision. Fritz has less letters for the same performance so Fritz is >>number one. >> >> >>:) >> > >:) > >Thanks for the answer. > >Jonas You're welcome. But if the three progs at the top are all the same qualified to be number one, then how should I be able to prove that one of the three is NOT qualified to be number one. That is simply called a contradiction/nonsense if I did try that. Oh well. Don't tell me that you didn't know all that. Criticising is not insulting! Many people don't understand that. The question remains why someone must by all means continue to be faithful to a false method. Here exactly we enter lobbyism and /or psychology. Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.