Author: Matt Taylor
Date: 05:44:36 02/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2003 at 07:16:59, martin fierz wrote: >On February 20, 2003 at 18:53:25, Russell Reagan wrote: > >>On February 20, 2003 at 17:54:12, martin fierz wrote: >> >>>------------------------------------------- >>>version XP 2400+ P4 1.4GHz >>>------------------------------------------- >>>"original" 2260 MIPS 1587 >>>VC 6 2373 1579 >>>VC.net 2496 1587 >>>gcc for P4 2420 1480 >>>gcc for AMD 1 2523 1451, then crash >>>gcc for AMD 2 2663 crash >>>------------------------------------------- >> >>If I'm reading this right, gcc is better for AMD processors, and MSVC is better >>for Intel processors. Any idea how the intel compiler compares? > >that's what i read into these numbers too. with the big IF that i'm not sure >whether TSCP is a good benchmark for "real" chess programs - it may be too >simple. i'll definitely try gcc with my checkers program and see what happens >there. >i don't have the intel compiler. but since i have included the comparison with >the "original" version of TSCP which is downloadable, someone with the intel >compiler could compare his version with what i got for the AMD; 18% faster than >the original on an athlon XP. >the downside is of course that the AMD version doesn't run on a P4... > >cheers > martin Which is strange. What could they be doing that would crash on a P4? 3DNow? GCC generates 3DNow code? Yeah, right... :-) -Matt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.