Author: Tony Hedlund
Date: 08:39:12 02/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2003 at 08:05:09, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On February 21, 2003 at 07:51:57, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>No matter what statistics say, they don't change the fact that the list was >>never intended to constitute who is THE number 1, and there is the culprit in >>your critique. > >This is the only "argument" worth a response. All other stuff is off-topic >personal attacks. Tony Hedlund, perhaps you heard the name before, just hast >confirmed me that this tradition - right from the begining - is the most >important reason for SSDF. Presenting a new number one all two months. And where did I confirm that? I told you that right from the beginning the list was a complement to our reviews over programs. An estimate for how strong each program is. Tony >And the >truth is that sometimes this is simply impossible to do. And then they can't do >it. But as we can see they still do it. And this is against the Law of stats. To >give the most important law for a rating list. > >If you now want to talk about the next Everest expedition, feel free, but don't >expect me to comment unless you pretend that due to less oxygen the Everest is >in reality only 7200 meters high. Then I will prove that that is a delusion. The >same with the number one Shredder. > >Rolf Tueschen
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.