Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 15:16:42 02/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2003 at 18:07:21, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>>>Here exactly we enter lobbyism and /or psychology. >>> >>>Or maybe they are just content with the way it is now. >> >>LOL.I never doubted it. But I think they pretend something they don't do. Their >>number one is not an independent result. - But look, I thought we had finished >>our exchange; to me this is worthless because you simply don't understand my >>points. > >I understand your points i just don't agree... and like i said i am neither for >nor aginst the SSDF. Sorry, I just want to inform that your attitude is ok in business related topics but in science /statistics it is not a valuable solution. There you cannot support mistakes. In business related fields you can support shit as long as it gives profit. That is the basic difference. BTW I do not think that a single program is shit. But in business there is much evil which is not our topic here. - One more time thank you, I think the different standpoints became clear. We should debate in new topics... Rolf Tueschen > >Regards >Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.