Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 16:17:12 02/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2003 at 18:16:42, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On February 21, 2003 at 18:07:21, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>>>>Here exactly we enter lobbyism and /or psychology. >>>> >>>>Or maybe they are just content with the way it is now. >>> >>>LOL.I never doubted it. But I think they pretend something they don't do. Their >>>number one is not an independent result. - But look, I thought we had finished >>>our exchange; to me this is worthless because you simply don't understand my >>>points. >> >>I understand your points i just don't agree... and like i said i am neither for >>nor aginst the SSDF. > >Sorry, I just want to inform that your attitude is ok in business related topics >but in science /statistics it is not a valuable solution. Who are you to decide 1. what my "attitude" is and 2. where it belongs? I thought you where against censorship... how condecending. There you cannot >support mistakes. In business related fields you can support shit as long as it >gives profit. That is the basic difference. BTW I do not think that a single >program is shit. But in business there is much evil which is not our topic here. >- One more time thank you, I think the different standpoints became clear. We >should debate in new topics... I agree let's agree to disagree and move on. Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.