Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 20:58:02 02/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 20, 2003 at 18:19:40, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On February 20, 2003 at 17:42:53, Vincent Lejeune wrote: > >> >>http://www.chessclub.com/event/kasparov-junior.html > > >Just one topic: It is awful to read a GM telling that DJ is better than DB2, >also positionally. It is strange. DB2 played nothing the like DJ played when it >had to lose by force so to speak. > >Excuse me, this is all so strange to read that I lost hope to get anything >rational from the DJ side. This is extremely sad because I always saw Amir on >the side of critical science, since he analysed the output of DB2 for Kasparov. > >Rolf Tueschen If you look at his analysis, it was _not_ very objective. I had to show some output from Crafty at the time to show exactly how the DB output made _perfect_ sense. There never was any "odd looking things" in the log for the axb5 move Kasparov wanted, unless someone _wanted_ things to look odd. Then anything can be cast as "suspicious". If you are looking for "objective analysis" concerning DB, you will have to look elsewhere...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.