Author: Charles Worthington
Date: 23:02:30 02/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On February 22, 2003 at 02:00:08, Charles Worthington wrote: >On February 22, 2003 at 01:33:32, Sally Weltrop wrote: > >>On February 22, 2003 at 01:03:35, Charles Worthington wrote: >> >>>I am continually being told "how much money I can save with $100.00 cpu's and >>>$50.00 motherboards". Where does the assumption originate from that all people >>>in the market for computers are looking to save money? I am a stock broker. I >>>use my computer for many functions other than running chess engines. I was after >>>realiability and performance. I cannot deal stocks on a machine that has water >>>flowing through it to prevent a meltdown. Is this so hard to understand? >>>Stability was far more important to me than saving a little money and rigging my >>>machine to look like a fire station with hoses everywhere and water leaks. I >>>dont_want_to have to go out and buy freon to prevent another three-mile-island >>>disaster from occuring in my office. I want my machine R I G H T. The way it was >>>engineered. When you have to plug your computer in next to a fire hydrant I >>>think it's time to seriously evaluate what you are doing. >> >>I don't blame u there CHarles, i think in this day and age with CPU's being >>upgraded every 2 months that it is foolish to overclock and this is coming from >>a former OC'r >>> >>>Yes Sally it is foolish. I expect that the 4GHz barrier will be broken within a year and a half tops. I prefer quality and for my business it is critical that my machine be stable...100%...not 99.999. :-) Unfortunately, however, we are but small voices of reason and we are ignored. Of course that doesn't matter to me what others do with_their_machines so long as they keep the copper tubing out of_mine_.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.